I've been a long time user of yahoo instant messenger. So I've upgraded it a few times through the years. The performance of the application has slowly degraded through time. Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on that phenomenon.
So why did I upgrade to the beta? Well, I had the false hopes that the latest version would do a better job on my laptop, which constantly bounces between a wireless and wired connection and the constant docking and undocking that I go through at work. The version I used could be counted on to repeatedly hang and just lock up.
So I upgraded! Dumb.
The UI feels substantially slower. I can see the repainting as I scroll around in the contact list. It's not like I'm running an old school pentium at 50 MHz. I have a respectable thinkpad thank you. When I was looking at the task manager process list in Windows, I noticed that my process takes up a whopping 40 megs.
That's more than IE and Firefox combined! Good lord. Do the programmers have no pride?
Your programming language might be able to do all that, but I'd be grateful if it wouldn't eat so much of entire computer in the process. I'll bet you dollars to donuts that buried in the brains of yahoo im is a cute little dynamic language interpreter ala javascript or ruby that devours everything in sight.
Comfortable for the programmer. Just not for the user.
I have read your article, I love them so much I will put your webpage is saved, they are really very good.
Posted by: juicy couture outlet | September 23, 2011 at 01:59 AM
This is my first time to your website, I send you the very distinctive, deserve me to treasure. Your article I learned a lot of things, thank you.
Posted by: Moncler | September 23, 2011 at 02:04 AM
Your article is one of the most classical style, when I read once, I have been deeply in love with them, you look forward to more perfect work.
Posted by: Moncler outlet | September 23, 2011 at 02:07 AM
Your article is one of the most classical style, when I read once, I have been deeply in love with them, you look forward to more perfect work.
Posted by: Moncler outlet | September 23, 2011 at 02:07 AM
I have been keeping track of your site for a long time I read these articles, this is an interesting reading I will continue to pay attention to it more
Posted by: moncler jacken | October 07, 2011 at 11:09 PM
Still miss your blog, I can say that they are the most worthy to see something, I will they treasured up they are my most rewarding that I would like to thank the author because of you, my life has become so colorful.
Posted by: Moncler online shop | October 07, 2011 at 11:11 PM
A feeling of your web site do too well beyond my imagination website content is very rich and I love reading each article I will slowly appreciate them
Posted by: Moncler outlet | October 07, 2011 at 11:14 PM
. O then, my beloved brethren, repent ye, and enter in at the straight gate, and continue in the way which is narrow, until ye shall obtain eternal life.
Posted by: beats by dr dre | November 26, 2011 at 12:05 AM
cast them into the fire, that they shall not cumber the ground of my vineyard, for I have done all; what could I have done more for my vineyard?
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Outlet | November 26, 2011 at 12:09 AM
Wherefore let us take of the branches of these which I have planted in the nethermost parts of my vineyard, and let us graft them into the tree from whence
Posted by: coach online outlet | November 26, 2011 at 12:12 AM
I am sorry for it. The introduction must be unpleasant, whenever it takes place; and the sooner it could be over the better.''
Posted by: beats by dre outlet | January 10, 2012 at 08:40 PM
Yes; and every delay makes one more apprehensive of other delays. Even if this family, the Braithwaites, are put off, I am still afraid that some excuse may be found for disappointing us.
Posted by: christian louboutin discount | January 10, 2012 at 08:44 PM
I cannot bear to imagine any reluctance on his side; but I am sure there is a great wish on the Churchills to keep him to themselves. There is jealousy.
Posted by: ray ban sale | January 10, 2012 at 08:47 PM